This is an interesting development.
The neocon homosexual Paul Joseph Watson tweeted an article attacking the Zionist shill Dan Crenshaw for saying that criticizing Israel shouldn’t be protected under the First Amendment.
Congressman Dan Crenshaw suggested that criticism of Israel should not be protected under the First Amendment during an event last night.https://t.co/hhs45atdUe
— Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) November 5, 2019
Crenshaw responded to Watson with a bullshit tweet.
The question wasn’t about “criticism,” but the BDS movement, ie economic warfare against Israel. The US govt CAN choose not to do business with BDS supporters.
Trying to spin this as if I said you “can’t criticize Israel” is deliberately misleading & journalistic malfeasance. https://t.co/bKqq9onMO2
— Dan Crenshaw (@DanCrenshawTX) November 6, 2019
Watson replied to Crenshaw with a solid point.
The question was focused around the 1st Amendment & included the issue of Florida passing a law that outlawed criticism of Israel within the education system.
Your immediate response was not to defend the sanctity of the 1st Amendment, but to call the questioner an anti-Semite. https://t.co/0E860MSoWs
— Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) November 6, 2019
But then he later tweeted how he wasn’t a fan of the BDS movement and attacked people who expose Israel.
I'm no fan of BDS or people who obsess all day about Israel, but the optics looked pretty bad, as did your security kicking out kids for their opinions during last night's event.
— Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) November 6, 2019
It is good that Watson attacked Crenshaw, but it feels as if Watson is trying to insert himself into the groyper war and may potentially try to misdirect it in some capacity. It’s a bizarre development much like how MILO dropped that Richard Spencer audio clip earlier this week.
And remember, Watson is a homosexual who actively supports the CIA-backed nonsense in Hong Kong. He’s basically gone full blown pro-Israel neocon. And I honestly have no idea why Crenshaw deliberately chose to respond to Watson. It doesn’t make any sense from a strategic standpoint. So who knows what type of fuckery is going on here. It is very strange.
