Facebook’s Jewish CEO Mark Zuckerberg was interviewed by Fox News yesterday and he basically sided with Donald Trump on the Twitter fact-check situation.
Zuckerberg said that private companies should not be the arbiter of truth even though the social media sites he runs bans and censors people for their political views and opinions.
All he’s doing is trying to bamboozle people into believing that Facebook doesn’t censor people even though they have been censoring people for years.
Just recently, Facebook was shutting down groups protesting the unconstitutional lockdown orders.
So really what Zuckerberg is doing is just disagreeing with Twitter doing this specifically weird fact-check on Trump.
It really wasn’t a smart move by Twitter though. Of all the posts they could have fact-checked him on, this was not a good choice. Trump was speculating about what would happen if mail-in ballots were used across the country. He wasn’t stating anything as a matter of fact.
And obviously Twitter hasn’t bothered to fact-check posts put out by media outlets on the Russia hoax and any number of other lies and falsehoods they’ve promoted. So it makes the whole fact-check of Trump look really dumb.
Twitter’s CEO Jack Dorsey responded to Zuckerberg and the various criticism Twitter has received over their bizarre fact-checking of the Trump tweet.
Fact check: there is someone ultimately accountable for our actions as a company, and that’s me. Please leave our employees out of this. We’ll continue to point out incorrect or disputed information about elections globally. And we will admit to and own any mistakes we make.
— jack (@jack) May 28, 2020
This does not make us an “arbiter of truth.” Our intention is to connect the dots of conflicting statements and show the information in dispute so people can judge for themselves. More transparency from us is critical so folks can clearly see the why behind our actions.
— jack (@jack) May 28, 2020
Per our Civic Integrity policy (https://t.co/uQ0AoPtoCm), the tweets yesterday may mislead people into thinking they don’t need to register to get a ballot (only registered voters receive ballots). We’re updating the link on @realDonaldTrump’s tweet to make this more clear.
— jack (@jack) May 28, 2020
Hey Jack, it isn’t your role to do any of this. Your role is simply to maintain a system that allows people to exchange information and ideas. That’s what a platform is supposed to be. You aren’t supposed to be tipping the scales. What you are doing is engaging in editorial decisions which makes you a publisher. This voids your status as a platform.
Here are some of the better responses to his gibberish.
Those employees who's JOB IT IS to oversee the "integrity" of Twitter think that there are literally Nazis running the county Jack.
The corporate culture you oversee is a CESSPOOL of insanity and hatred.
What a business you have.
— Mark Dice (@MarkDice) May 28, 2020
Nobody believes you. You have no integrity and your employees are just as biased if not more than you are. You are putting your thumb on the election and everyone knows it. Your "fact checking" will be one sided. Bet.
— Chris Manning (@Manning4USCong) May 28, 2020
Fact check? When did Twitter assume the responsibility of judges and prosecutors? How to prove your absolute correctness?
— StandWithHK (@livinghu) May 28, 2020
You’re doing this to influence an election and you know it.
— Lauren Boebert for Congress (R-CO3) (@laurenboebert) May 28, 2020
Trump just posted another statement about this fiasco calling out Twitter for being wrong about their stupid fact-check.
So ridiculous to see Twitter trying to make the case that Mail-In Ballots are not subject to FRAUD. How stupid, there are examples, & cases, all over the place. Our election process will become badly tainted & a laughingstock all over the World. Tell that to your hater @yoyoel
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 28, 2020
Supposedly Trump is going to sign an executive order targeting Twitter and these big social media companies today. Of course I’m skeptical that it will do anything meaningful.
Really what needs to happen is that these companies need to regulated as public utilities sort of like how telephone service was regulated in the prior century. What these companies are doing is the equivalent of the phone company back in the 1960s refusing you service because of a political view you have. It’s absolute bullshit what they are doing.
If this is not part of the action that is taken today, than I doubt it will have any impact on the status-quo. We will see though. I don’t want to be overly pessimistic, but there’s honestly no reason to be optimistic. The Trump administration has just been a long series of disappointments.