The New York Times has basically sold what little credibility it had left into becoming a full blown engine of anti-Trump hatred. There isn’t much difference between it and sites like Buzzfeed now.
Their former executive editor the Jewess Jill Abramson has criticized them for this.
A former executive editor of the New York Times says the paper’s news pages, the home of its straight-news coverage, have become “unmistakably anti-Trump.”
Jill Abramson, the veteran journalist who led the newspaper from 2011 to 2014, says the Times has a financial incentive to bash the president and that the imbalance is helping to erode its credibility.
In a soon-to-be published book, “Merchants of Truth,” that casts a skeptical eye on the news business, Abramson defends the Times in some ways but offers some harsh words for her successor, Dean Baquet. And Abramson, who was the paper’s only female executive editor until her firing, invoked Steve Bannon’s slam that in the Trump era the mainstream media have become the “opposition party.”
Yeah and Baquet is just some dumb token nigger they put into her previous role. The paper has and is still run by the Jewish Sulzberger family.
Abramson is expressing a concern that her fellow racial kinsmen are disregarding. She’s saying that they’ve gone too far with their anti-Trump coverage and now a large percentage of the goyim no longer trust them as a credible source of information.
Her concern is valid. The big media operations which are almost all run by Jews have pumped out coverage of Trump’s presidency that has been over 90 percent negative. You can’t claim to be objective and neutral observers when this type of ratio exists.
And here’s the thing, it is hard to see these old guard media brands ever getting their credibility back. The Jews went too far and they are not leven istening to reasonable suggestions from their own racial group.