Most Russians according to a new poll believe that the Apollo Moon landings were faked. I can’t blame them for thinking this because there’s many reasons to believe that they were a big hoax.
RT:
Over a half of all Russians believe that US astronauts have never been on the Moon and that the US authorities and NASA covered up this fact by forging proof of moon landings, a new poll shows.
In the recent survey titled “Science and society: authority and trust” experts of the Russian state-run public opinion research center VTSIOM wrote that 57 percent of Russians currently think that the US claims of successful manned Moon missions are lies and that the documented proof of these missions was forged. Only 24 percent of respondents said that they believed that the manned Moon missions were real.
Researchers also specified that 65 percent of those who think that the US authorities are lying about the moon landings have secondary education.
However, Russians are not only suspicious about the NASA moon missions. 59 percent of the poll participants share the opinion that “scientists conceal the truth from common people.” Even among Russians with higher education the proportion was extremely high – at 45 percent.
It’s been almost 50 years since the Apollo 11 mission when Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin were allegedly the first men to walk on the moon. If it was so easy to put a man on the moon back then, how come nobody else has been able to do it after the Apollo missions concluded in the 1970s? We’ve had all sorts of engineering and technology advances since that time.
The Apollo 11 mission occurred only a couple of years after the Apollo 1 mission in which three astronauts were blown up on the launch pad. So we went from blowing up astronauts on the launch pad to landing a man on the moon in the course of two years. Such progress in such a short period of time is highly improbable.
And if the moon landing deniers are wrong, why the fuck hasn’t NASA just taken some high definition photos of the alleged Apollo moon landing sites? This should be a fairly easy thing to do with modern day equipment.
Back in 2011, NASA released some shit quality images allegedly taken of the Apollo moon landing sites from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. The images show nothing of specific value. Meanwhile, we’ve had the Hubble telescope taking very detailed high quality color photographs of things many light years away.
And then you got shit about fake moon rocks and other crazy stories.
There’s just too many things that don’t add up about the Apollo missions. So yes, I’ve been in the camp that thinks they’ve been faked for quite awhile now.
But fuck, the Hollywood Jews are releasing a new movie about the Apollo 11 mission. So based on that I guess the average American is going to continue believing that the Apollo missions were real.
