Hillary Clinton said that she would most want to be the CEO of Facebook if given the chance to be CEO of any company in the world.
RT:
Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg better watch out, as Hillary Clinton said she would like to be the company’s CEO because of its power as a media outlet.
Clinton was speaking at Harvard University, where she was awarded the Radcliffe Medal on Friday. Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey asked Clinton if she could be CEO of any company, what would she choose.
“Facebook,” Clinton quickly said. “I mean, I just want to add, it’s the biggest news platform in the world.”
“Most people in our country get their news, true or not, through Facebook,” she added.
“Now, Facebook is trying to take on some of the unexpected consequences of their business model and I for one hope they get it right, because it really is critical to our democracy that people get accurate information on which to make decisions.”
The reason she provided for wanting to be the CEO of Facebook is patently ridiculous. She wants to run Facebook to control the information that people get.
But how is that democratic? The theory of a democracy is that all people are smart enough to make their own decisions based upon an unlimited amount of information. So why would there be a need to have a third party control what information people have access to?
Her point completely undermines the core concept of democracy itself. The main reason Jews have favored democracies is because they can control how people vote by controlling the media. This model was fine for much of the post World War II era because they had total control over the media. But in recent years, they’ve lost this control as the Internet became increasingly developed. Now they’re doing everything they can to censor alternative views and opinions from the Internet. This is why you see social media sites like Facebook and Twitter using abstract reasons to ban and censor people.
Democracy in its current form is patently stupid. It’s nothing more than a competition by competing forces to mold the minds of the masses many of who don’t have the agency to be making societal decisions to begin with. It could be a workable system if the only people allowed to vote were people who had proper agency and a viable stake in the country. Unfortunately, we haven’t had a system like this since the very early days of the Republic. These days, we have retarded niggers, vapid whores and other idiots who have just as much of a say in politics as much more competent and higher agency people. Only an idiot would think that this is a good system.
